03 · How regulation develops

Choice, self-monitoring and independence

The goal is a student who resets on their own. Choice and self-monitoring help students take over what adults start.

Three steps along a line: the teacher cues a reset, the student chooses a technique, and later the student starts one on their own — the direction choice and self-monitoring research points.

Co-regulation is meant to hand over. Two bodies of classroom research describe how: giving students real choices, and teaching them to notice and track their own behavior.

The studies

What was tested, and what it found

  1. Royer et al. 2017

    Systematic review applying the Council for Exceptional Children's quality standards.

    Who
    26 experimental studies (25 articles) of instructional choice with school-age students.
    Found
    Offering instructional choices increased desired academic behavior and decreased disruptive behavior. Because of small samples and study quality, the authors rated the evidence base as insufficient under the CEC's evidence-based standards.

    Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., Cantwell, E. D., & Messenger, M. L. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K–12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), 89–107. doi.org/10.1177/0198742916688655

  2. Bruhn et al. 2015

    Systematic review of self-monitoring interventions.

    Who
    41 studies (2000–2012) of self-monitoring interventions with K–12 students with persistent behavior problems.
    Found
    Students with behavior challenges can learn to notice, track and adjust their own behavior with structured self-monitoring.

    Bruhn, A., McDaniel, S., & Kreigh, C. (2015). Self-monitoring interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review of current research. Behavioral Disorders, 40(2), 102–121. doi.org/10.17988/BD-13-45.1

Where it stops

How each source applies — and where it stops

  • Royer et al. 2017

    How it appliesOffering students a choice is a promising, low-effort way to support engagement.A review of K–12 studies found instructional choice to be a low-effort, teacher-delivered strategy linked to more engagement and less disruption — the reason each card offers students a choice of techniques.

  • Bruhn et al. 2015

    How it appliesStudents can learn to notice and track their own behavior.A review of self-monitoring research found students with behavior challenges can learn to track and adjust their own behavior — the skill a reset routine builds toward.

Our next study

Whether offering a choice of reset techniques helps the way academic choice has — that's untested for regulation.

How we'll measure it

How Mind Circuit uses this

Each card offers students a choice of techniques, and the routine is designed to build toward students starting a reset themselves. Royer et al. studied choice between academic tasks — and rated that evidence as promising but not yet conclusive — and Bruhn et al. studied self-monitoring tools, mostly with students with behavior challenges. Extending both to resets is what our next study looks at.

We use cookies to understand how visitors use our site so we can improve it. Learn more.